Page 12 - KDU Law Journal Volume 4 Issue 2
P. 12

KDU Law Journal                                  Volume 04 Issue II
                                                              September, 2024
             States,   the  Supreme  Court  held  that  law  enforcement  officials
                   6
             must obtain a warrant to access historical cell phone location data.
             The Court held that individuals have reasonable expectancy in
             the privacy of their location data, and therefore, law enforcement
             must meet the standard of probable cause to access such data .
                                                                       7
             This decision recognized the importance of protecting individuals’
             digital footprints from unwarranted intrusion by the government,
             thereby affirming the significance of privacy in the digital age.

             In the case of United States vs Jones , the Supreme Court held that
                                             8
             the government installation of a GPS tracking device on a suspect’s
             car  constituted  a violation  of the  Fourth Amendment  protection
             against unreasonable search and seizures. The court emphasized
             that the use of surveillance through GPS infringes the privacy of a
             person. This case highlighted the need for clear guidelines on the
             use of surveillance technology by government agencies and set a
             precedent for protecting individuals from unwarranted government
             intrusion.
             In the case of United States vs Miller , addressed the privacy rights
                                              9
             of financial records held by banks. The Supreme Court held that
             individuals do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their
             bank records, as they voluntarily disclose this information to a third
             party. This case establishes the “third-party doctrine”, which allows
             law enforcement to access certain types of personal information
             without a warrant. This decision has significant implications for
             modern-day privacy concerns, particularly in the context of digital
             data collection and surveillance by tech companies and government
             agencies.




             6  Carpenter vs. United States (2018) 585 U.S
             7  Privacy Law Library, National Law University Delhi,( https://nluwebsite.s3.ap-south-1.
             amazonaws.com/uploads/carpenter-vs-united-states-5.pdf) accessed 5  December 2023.
                                                          th
             8  United States vs Jones (2012) 565 U.S. 400.
             9  United States vs Miller (1976) 425 U.S 435
                                                             law.faculty@kdu.ac.lk
                                          5
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17